Episode 05Risk

Mapping NIST AI RMF to Your Existing Security Program

NIST AI RMF Bridge Guide

Video coming soon

The NIST AI RMF is comprehensive but written for AI practitioners, not security leaders. CISOs reading it cannot quickly identify which requirements their existing programs already satisfy and which represent genuine gaps.

“The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is 72 pages. Your security program already covers more of it than you think. I built the mapping table. Here’s exactly what you already have and what you need to add.”

Architecture Diagrams

4-quadrant GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE mapping diagram

Gap analysis: existing coverage vs. required extensions

Implementation effort matrix (requirement vs. effort level)

Build Notes

Core GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE mapping tables with CISO program equivalents
GOVERN maps to security governance and risk appetite statements
MAP maps to threat modeling and asset inventory
MEASURE maps to vulnerability assessment and compliance testing

Lessons Learned

Mapping reveals that 60-70% of AI RMF requirements are already met by mature cybersecurity programs
The gaps cluster in three areas: AI-specific threat modeling, model lifecycle governance, and bias/fairness testing
The biggest effort is cultural, not technical — getting AI engineering teams to participate in security governance
Board communication templates are the highest-leverage output

Discussion

If you’ve looked at the NIST AI RMF, which function felt most familiar to your existing program? Which felt completely foreign?